Adobe pr ae5/26/2023 ![]() I never try to use that like a real editing computer. It works well.īut on laptop I only have the chip from Nvidia. My fully discreet graphics card ( in desktop ) has fan on it and it's HUGE. ![]() ![]() You can't disable it and go through the Nvidia chip only. I also have other stuff, but it's irrevalent ( like SDI card for hero monitor ).Īnyway, when you boot the laptop you HAVE to use the bios internal graphics just to see your screen on boot. I have an editing computer (custom) with an Nvidia graphics card plugged into a pci x16 express port of mobo. But it's only the chip there on the mobo and not a real full discreet 'graphics card'. I have a laptop like you ( hp omen gaming computer) with an Nvidia chip. ![]() So my question is, why isn't the NVidia GPU being used all the time for these operations, which it is clearly much better at? Why does Pr switch between the two GPUs? I've also noticed that when i added Grain Removal in Ae, and then rendered the clip back in Pr, it is using the Intel chip to render, and it takes a very long time. Playback is choppy (or won't play at all). At which point, the NVidia GPU activity drops to zero, and the Intel increases significantly. Occasionally, when I have added certain effects, such as transition effects, I notice that it is playing along smoothly, until after it passes the transition effect. Playback is smooth, and rendering is fast. In Premiere, under Project Settings - General, I have selected Mercury Playback Engine GPU Accleraction (CUDA), and in After Effects, under Preferences - Previews, clicking the GPU Information button lists the NVidia card.įor the most part, when I am playing back or rendering, I can see activity on the NVidia GPU. I have a laptop with Intel Integrated HD Graphics (8GB Shared Memory), and a discrete nVidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q and 4GB RAM. I am fairly new to Adobe Pr and Ae, and would like to better understand how it is utilizing the GPUs in my computer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |